Conditions That Governed Ashford Settlement Iowa
Owing to the disputes between Bridgepoint and Education, Inc. (BPI) and Ashford, there was an agreement that was arrived at in order to end their misunderstandings. According to Iowa Attorney General, there were claims that the University of Ashford used misleading information to its students. Also, it was also claimed that, Ashford used illegal methods to advertise the name of this university. The university was in turn accused of not giving relevant material facts to students. Although both parties denied these allegations, they decided to come into an agreement. The Ashford settlement Iowa was then formed on May 15, 2014.
Among the issues that lead to the misunderstanding between Bridgepoint & Education, Inc. And Ashford the use of force and misleading information to sale the name of this particular university. There was a claim that the university did not faithfully disclose all the relevant material facts to its students. In addition, Ashford used dubious means to recruit and enroll learners. Some people also claimed that a technology fee was imposed to students six weeks after they were enrolled.
There are several issues, which were addressed during the agreement. In the agreement, the roles of the administrator were outlined. For instance, administrator was appointed. His main duty was to oversee Bridgepoint Education, Inc. And Ashford. In addition, administrator was to keep monitoring whether the two parties complied with the agreement for a period of three years. He was to report his findings to the Iowa Attorney General.
After the administrator was appointed, he was supposed to work as a neutral element between Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (BPI) and Ashford. The administrator was entrusted to with the responsibility of ensuring that, the two parties followed the terms and conditions of this settlement. He was to give report of his observations to the Iowa A. G after three years.
According to the agreement, Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (BPI) and Ashford were to contribute a certain amount of money. A total of 7,250,000 dollars were to get given as per the agreement. The Attorney General was to determine those parties who were eligible to receive a portion of this money. For example, those residents who had been enrolled in the university were supposed to receive a certain amount of money as reimbursement.
During the agreement, a question arose as to who were eligible to get some shares of these money. The settlement terms were to clarify this issue so the individual who were eligible to get this money could apply. Those who were eligible included residents who were enrolled before and during the settlement. It was also clear that, the administrator possessed no authority to decide who was to receive this money.
This Agreement guaranteed the students to get genuine, fair and holistic information concerning matters affecting the university. For instance, the students were to get relevant material facts. In addition, they were to be admitted on fair grounds as per the regulation. Ashford was also prohibited to use all illegal dealings and practices.
There was also a need to give clear means of communication. This was to facilitate communication and settlement of any issues arising from the agreement. In case of any claim, the administrator was supposed to become the first person to get informed. For complicated issues, the Iowa A. G was to be informed.
Among the issues that lead to the misunderstanding between Bridgepoint & Education, Inc. And Ashford the use of force and misleading information to sale the name of this particular university. There was a claim that the university did not faithfully disclose all the relevant material facts to its students. In addition, Ashford used dubious means to recruit and enroll learners. Some people also claimed that a technology fee was imposed to students six weeks after they were enrolled.
There are several issues, which were addressed during the agreement. In the agreement, the roles of the administrator were outlined. For instance, administrator was appointed. His main duty was to oversee Bridgepoint Education, Inc. And Ashford. In addition, administrator was to keep monitoring whether the two parties complied with the agreement for a period of three years. He was to report his findings to the Iowa Attorney General.
After the administrator was appointed, he was supposed to work as a neutral element between Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (BPI) and Ashford. The administrator was entrusted to with the responsibility of ensuring that, the two parties followed the terms and conditions of this settlement. He was to give report of his observations to the Iowa A. G after three years.
According to the agreement, Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (BPI) and Ashford were to contribute a certain amount of money. A total of 7,250,000 dollars were to get given as per the agreement. The Attorney General was to determine those parties who were eligible to receive a portion of this money. For example, those residents who had been enrolled in the university were supposed to receive a certain amount of money as reimbursement.
During the agreement, a question arose as to who were eligible to get some shares of these money. The settlement terms were to clarify this issue so the individual who were eligible to get this money could apply. Those who were eligible included residents who were enrolled before and during the settlement. It was also clear that, the administrator possessed no authority to decide who was to receive this money.
This Agreement guaranteed the students to get genuine, fair and holistic information concerning matters affecting the university. For instance, the students were to get relevant material facts. In addition, they were to be admitted on fair grounds as per the regulation. Ashford was also prohibited to use all illegal dealings and practices.
There was also a need to give clear means of communication. This was to facilitate communication and settlement of any issues arising from the agreement. In case of any claim, the administrator was supposed to become the first person to get informed. For complicated issues, the Iowa A. G was to be informed.
About the Author:
Our website gives former students and employees the opportunity to learn about Ashford settlement Iowa law. Come and meet the administration team online at http://www.ashfordsettlement.com.