Essential Details On Trademark Dilution

By Donna Kelly


The judiciary arm in many countries enforces all the laws that apply to their respective jurisdiction. Various laws have been billed on matters relating to business operations for a non-turbulent flow of routine activities. This is vividly evidenced by the enactment of trademark dilution law that privileges business units with the right to restrict the use of their recognizable marks by others. In this way, their unique identity is safeguarded and is free from depreciation.

The law is recognized in several jurisdictions globally, though the interpretation varies from country to country as well as the resulting penalties. However, other jurisdictions do not recognize this law, but they have a similar concept to address the same menace. They recognize amortization of goodwill which provides a concrete remedy for trademark owners. This protects them from the unauthorized third-party use of the logo that might devalue the goodwill clung to a registered logo.

The sole requirement for a plaintiff to make a successful claim is that the recognition of the logo should be famous. This elucidates that; it should have a favorable public impression on its existence and should be easily recognized by consumers. This feature is central in that it dictates on the level of protection to be attached towards a well-known clause for the law awards protection in respect to its fame.

The law primarily soldiers more on the protecting the strength of any business that is derived from ownership of reputable identity. Thus, it eradicates a turmoil that might arise from the unauthorized use of a mark justifiably weakening the ability to identify and distinguish goods and services of the true mark owner. This approach gives the owner the powers to control the identity of his products in the market segment he crowns.

Similarly, the law also requires the owner of the recognition mark to show the likelihood of dilution rather than its actual existence. This is essential for the award of relief in that it does not necessitate him or her to spend time and monetary resources filing for actual existence as the evidence. This is because it is always much easier and less subtle to find evidence on bases of likelihood rather than the actual occurrence of such scenarios.

Additionally, the law is applied in cases of a blurred dilution which arises when an entity willingly uses a famed business clause or mark on its product brands. The third party brand might be different from those of the authentic owner of this trademark. This malpractice affects the recognition of products and services of the true clause owner.

Nevertheless, the violation can also be done through tarnishing practices. This situation arises when an unauthorized entity uses a reputable brand mark in offensive scenarios. This attacks the logo in a negative way that devalues the remarkable the brand. Often a times, this type of dilution is confused with the speech rights that consider some practices fair use of a mark without mentioning the exact names of famed clauses.

Therefore, the enactment of this legislation has been of great importance in the corporate world as it has minimized unethical practices in the realm. This is worth an accolade for it has led to a smooth flow of business activities and also has fortified the incentive to work more for the capabilities of individuals.




About the Author:



Popular Posts