The Elements That Affect Public Service Before Politics

By Nancy Fox


The activities of most jurisdictional regions are affected by various institutional factors. Such factors include; socio-economic, cultural and political. The latter scope is highly effective as far as the performance of government activities is concerned. It affects the administration of various state provisions that are mandatory to be provided by respective state agencies to all the citizens. The prior ideology outlines the public service before politics and its effects on state operations.

There are various motives that affect the political atmosphere in any jurisdiction. They mostly take the form of public facilities that are core in boosting the overall well-being of all citizens. The prime motive that poses a direct impact on political operations is the service attributes. This is because; they have a high effective power that entices the politicians to commit more resources on specific provisions to gain the favor of citizens.

The degree to which the political agents and provider organizations are monitored also stages a reflexive response on how the facilities will be provided. This determines the manner in which such provisions will be made during the early stages of a political campaign. The level of monitoring that is instituted has modification effects on various political procedures, processes, and anticipated outcomes. This is because they cannot be muted but can be modified accordingly.

Similarly, the level of user pressure is also a core factor that drives the providers to channel the services. The pressure is made effective by the intensity in which it is voiced out and also the approach used by citizens to raise their issues. This is because the public provisions usually create a link that binds the voters and politicians. The manner in which the politicians carry out their duties nourishes the trust of people and their state expectations.

The provisions should be given a priority by the respective providers who are politicians. They thus need to be delivered with a high degree of integrity. They should also be centered around the wants of citizens as well being responsive to their needs, especially those that are the most vulnerable. Thus, the state should promote greater transparency, enable citizens to voice their preferences to facilitate better use of funds and foster service delivery.

In addition, the manner in which these provisions are distributed before politics is determined by the political and social consensus. This is due to the fact that the services are not provided in a mutually responsive approach, but in an elective democratic approach. The approach roots the ground for an equitable resource distribution in any country. However, the approach used usually has some political connections.

Moreover, user power, service characteristics, politician accountability, and information asymmetry are the core determinants on how the provisions will be made before the onset of politics. The candidates use various mechanisms basing on the prior mentioned pillars in an attempt of luring the citizens for consideration in a specific post. This has been the order of the day since time immemorial. However, this should not be the case since the provisions are essential for the welfare of people.

Thus, the norm is upholstered in many countries and state jurisdictions where such provisions are made in abundance before the political campaign gain force. It has been criticized by various philanthropic organizations and leaders as well as. This is due to the fact that the provisions form part of essential rights that every citizen should enjoy regardless of prevailing conditions.




About the Author:



Popular Posts